And of course people immediately started to interpret their own thoughts and ideas on the "results" of this study.
Here is an overview of what people are reading out of the study:
NEVERTHELESS: I can just give you the hint to read the study by yourself and make your own opinion out of it...
---------------
Verweise
[1] https://forestindustries.eu/de/new-study-suggests-global-pacts-redd-ignore-primary-causes-destruction-forests
[2] http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/richardblack/2011/01/forests_redd_or_dead.html
[3] http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_round_up/742516/un_forest_protection_plans_linked_to_land_grabbing.html
[4] http://news.mongabay.com/2011/0124-redd_iufro.html
[5] http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/1938907/scientists-urge-shield-forest-communities-redd
[6] http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFJOE70N00920110124
[7] https://forestindustries.eu/de/category/topicsthemen/forestry
[8] https://forestindustries.eu/de/category/forests-w%C3%A4lder/deforestation
[9] https://forestindustries.eu/de/category/forests-w%C3%A4lder/redd
[10] https://forestindustries.eu/de/category/forests-w%C3%A4lder/abholzung
[11] https://forestindustries.eu/de/category/forests-w%C3%A4lder/klimawandel
[12] https://forestindustries.eu/de/category/forests-w%C3%A4lder/klima%C3%A4nderung
[13] https://forestindustries.eu/de/category/forests-w%C3%A4lder/climate-change
[14] https://forestindustries.eu/de/category/article-series/redd-governance